Swansea Building Society Solicitor Panel Example Support Desk Enquires
from members of the public
What is the rationale as to why all solicitors are not on the Swansea Building Society Conveyancing panel?
Lenders point to the fact that solicitor-led fraud is thought to be responsible for millions of pounds of fraud every year. The removal of law firms off of lender panels started with the rise in mortgage fraud, which prompted a thematic review by the Financial Services Authority in 2011. Its outcome included recommendations for lenders to review their conveyancing panels, which kicked off a major policy change in the sector. It led to banks and building societies purging less reputable firms off their books
I am buying a newly constructed apartment and my lawyer is telling me that she is duty bound to disclose incentives from the seller as her firm is on the Swansea Building Society conveyancing panel. I am nearing the developer’s deadline to exchange contracts and I would rather not delay matters. Is my lawyer right?
You should not exchange unless you have advised to do so by your lawyer. A precondition to being on the Swansea Building Society approved panel is to comply with the CML Handbook requirements (last updated for this lender on Swansea Building Society). The CML Conveyancing Handbook requires that your lawyer have the appropriate Disclosure of Incentive form completed by the developer and accepted by your lender.
Are the lawyers identified as being on the Swansea Building Society conveyancing panel, together with their details provided by Swansea Building Society?
The law firm practices themselves provide us confirmation that they are on the Swansea Building Society conveyancing panel as opposed to being supplied with a list from Swansea Building Society directly.
My house is up for sale and I have a buyer. Does my solicitor have to be on the Swansea Building Society conveyancing panel in order to deal with redeeming my mortgage?
Ordinarily, even if your lawyer is not on the Swansea Building Society conveyancing panel they can still act for you on your sale. it might be that the lender will not release the original deeds (if applicable and increasingly irrelevant) until after the mortgage is paid off. You should speak to your lawyer directly before you start the process though to ensure that there is no problem as lenders are changing their requirements fairly frequently at the moment.
How can we tell if a solicitor on the Swansea Building Society panel is any good?
seeking recommendations is a good start. Before you go ahead check if they offer a no sale no fee offer. Also you often get what you pay for - a firm which quotes more will often provide a better service than one which is cheap as chips. We would always recommend that you speak with the solicitor conducting your conveyancing
Do the majority of banks operate their own panel of solicitors?
Many lenders do operate a restricted conveyancing panel but a lot of lenders allow any solicitors to join their panel so long as they meet their criteria. Each lender sets their own criteria. For example the Swansea Building Society conveyancing panel requirements are different to Swansea Building Society’s conveyancing panel criteria.
I am due to exchange contracts on my apartment. I had a double glazing fitted in month 7 but did not receive a FENSA certificate or Building Regulation Certificate. My purchaser’s mortgage company, Swansea Building Society are being a right pain. The solicitor who is on the Swansea Building Society conveyancing panel is recommending indemnity insurance as a solution but Swansea Building Society are requiring a building regulation certificate. Why do Swansea Building Society have a conveyancing panel of they don’t accept advice from them?
It is probably the case that Swansea Building Society have referred the matter to their valuer. The reason why Swansea Building Society may not want to accept indemnity insurance is because it does not give them any reassurance that the double glazing correctly and safely installed. It merely protects against enforcement action which is very unlikely anyway.